Skip to content
Trending eventWatching

Identifiability-aware LiDAR-Inertial-BIM fusion method proposed

1 reports1 sources2 days agoUpdated

What happened

AI overview

Yujie Zhang and other authors propose an identifiability-aware LiDAR-inertial-BIM fusion localization method for robot BIM localization and fault attribution under construction deviations. The approach reports attribution only when a fault is attributable; otherwise, it retains candidates, defers BIM updates and BIM-based pose corrections in ambiguous directions, and resumes once new references arrive. In a preregistered two-dimensional study, for detectable but non-attributable cases, the method's conditional error rate was 0.83%, compared with 31.67% for a baseline using uncertainty-based abstention at the same answer rate. In paired fault injections in a laboratory room (with its IFC model) and on three floors of the SLABIM dataset, the method produced no off-target attributions (0 of 168 conditions in the laboratory, 0 of 1302 conditions in SLABIM) and attributed all 8 laboratory faults predicted to be attributable; both reproduced baselines exhibited off-target structural markers in all settings.

AI 根据报道生成 · 2 days ago更新

Reporting timeline

Follow the reporting to explore different perspectives.

11月9日
  1. arXiv cs.RO
    When to Trust BIM: Identifiability-Aware LiDAR-Inertial-BIM Fusion under As-Built Deviations

    The paper formalizes the attribution problem of inconsistencies between scans and models in LiDAR-inertial odometry and BIM fusion as fault identification over three fault classes, and derives a geometric criterion for determining whether attribution is feasible. On cases that are detectable but not attributable in a two-dimensional study, the method based on this criterion had a conditional error rate of 0.83%, compared with 31.67% for a baseline using uncertainty-based abstention; across 5,600 attributable cases, it produced 5,574 unique attributions with no erroneous attributions.

Activity for this event

Current
3
Peak
10Nov 9 14:00
Past 24 hours
-50%

The trend compares participants observed throughout the same period, so its range may be smaller than the current interest count. Move or tap to inspect each hour; use the arrow keys on a keyboard.