Event
Four-Engine Simulation Comparison: Consistent Success/Failure but Contact Forces Differ Tenfold
1 reports · 1 sources
Manda Robotics released a simulator comparison report in early October, running experiments with the same Franka seven-axis robotic arm and the same control program on four physics engines: PhysX, MuJoCo, MuJoCo Warp, and Genesis. The results showed that task success/failure judgments were consistent, but values involving force and contact differed by up to tenfold. Harry wrote an interpretation of the report and, combined with his own SO-101 simulation experience, offered selection recommendations. The report's scope is limited to engine-to-engine comparison; it did not use a real robot as a reference. Harry recommends that any conclusion related to force and contact be re-run on a different engine; if the task involves soft objects such as cloth, sponge, food, or cables, it needs to be verified separately in each engine used.
Report timeline
- How to Choose a Robot Simulator: Same Success, Tenfold Contact Force Gap
The article interprets a simulator comparison report released by Manda Robotics in early October, running about ten sets of experiments with the same Franka 7-axis robotic arm and the same control program on four physics engines: PhysX, MuJoCo, MuJoCo Warp, and Genesis.
Xbotics具身智能实验室 · 微信公众号 ·